当前位置：主页 > 湖南 >

艾曼妞3:爱的课程

‘Hong Kong Alliance’ found guilty of inciting subversion; verdict clarifies boundaries between free speech and national security_我的网站

一 |

West Kowloon Law Courts Building in Hong Kong Photo: VCG
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported.
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported.
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said.
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued.
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said.
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday.
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said.
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added.
。海淀区中关村第一小学西二旗分校与怀柔区长哨营满族乡中心小学手拉手数学学科“同课异构”活动 “同”聚智慧 “异”起成长在教育均衡发展与协同共进理念的引领下，北京市积极开展手拉手学校项目，旨在促进不同区域学校间的资源共享与交流合作，为广大师生搭建更为广阔的学习与成长平台。 “水本无华，相荡乃成涟漪；石本无火，相击而发灵光。”2024 年 12 月 13 日，中关村第一小学西二旗分校与怀柔区长哨营满族乡中心小学，在这一富有意义的项目推动下，携手开展了一场别开生面的数学教学交流活动。

二 | 中关村第一小学西二旗分校的孔京京老师，与怀柔区长哨营满族乡中心小学的彭晓利老师，共同讲授一节数学课。北京教育科学研究院特级教师郭立军老师现场指导。 PART 01 孔京京老师聚焦一个单元所承载的核心素养整体设计，进阶式引导学生深入认识小数。

三 | 在教学中，她既紧密结合生活实际中小数的应用，也注重数学史中小数的发展，让学生在广博的时空中认识小数的由来以及小数的实际价值。最后，学生尝试用小数表示自己的身高、食品的价签，灵活迁移、思维敏捷，既有独立思考，又有智慧碰撞。孔老师注重教学内容与生活实际的紧密关联性，巧妙地引入生活场景中小数的广泛应用实例，让学生深切体会到小数在日常生活中的无处不在与实际价值。 PART 02 彭晓利老师在教学过程中展现出卓越的引导能力，其教学风格亲和且极具感染力，能够循循善诱、娓娓道来。

四 | 在课程开启之前，借助精心设计的微课，引导学生预先对所学内容有所涉猎与思考，为课堂学习奠定良好基础。课堂之上，彭老师以学生的发现与疑问作为切入点，巧妙地逐步梳理出学习小数所应具备的思维架构；将零散的知识点进行系统整合，转化为具有逻辑性与关联性的结构性知识体系，助力学生构建清晰的认知地图，而这一认知地图也成为学生在后续学习中实现知识迁移与灵活运用的有力工具，极大地提升了学生的学习效能与知识内化水平。 PART 03 郭立军老师对两位教师的课表示了赞扬与肯定，她指出了两位教师的相同点：都采用了至少两种数学模型助力学生打开对小数认识的大门；不同之处在于两位老师分别采用了顺向和逆向的思维活动帮助学生认识小数的意义，感受小数与实际生活的密切联系。最后，郭立军老师分别从水平数学化和垂直数学化介绍了学生的思维层级，鼓励老师们从宏观结构来理解认识每个知识点，以撬动孩子们的生长点。 PART 04 本次“同课异构”评价研讨会，不仅是一次教学艺术的精彩展示，更是一场教育理念的深刻碰撞。两位教师为我们生动诠释了“同课异构、同标异思”的深刻内涵。这样的教学形式，不仅是教师们打开思路、发挥教学创意、彰显个性魅力的有效途径，更是我们探索新课程标准下高效课堂教学模式、提升教学质量、优化课堂结构、打造品质课堂的一次宝贵尝试。

五 | 教学是发现、是分享、是成长。通过两位老师的精彩演绎和专家的深刻点评，在场的每位老师都体会到“同课异构”的魅力所在——在异构中比较，在比较中反思，在反思中提高。这种方式有效助推了教师的专业成长，促进了我校教研水平的提升，为各自的教学注入新的活力。今天的“同课异构” 只是一个美好的开始，它将成为我们不断探索、勇于创新、持续进步的起点。 – END – 文字丨王雨编辑丨新闻宣传中心审核丨高菲菲校对丨郭琪琪。